We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Tennessee Volunteers
Location: Knoxville, TN Conference: SEC Share: Show Links/Banners
Website: utsports.com Message Board: volnation.com/forum Shop: Buy Tennessee Volunteers Gear

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team is projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 7
High NET: 3 4 days
Low NET: 17 Dec 3
KenPom: 5
BPI: 7
Sagarin: 9
KPI: 4 T-Rank: 7
Opp Avg NET: 84
Avg NET Win: 104
Avg NET Loss: 23
NET SOS: 10
NET OOC SOS: 16
RPI SOS: 25
RPI OOC SOS: 42
Record: 27-9
Home: 14-2
Away: 8-3
Neutral: 5-4
SOR: 6

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 10-8
Home: 4 - 1
Away: 4 - 3
Neutral: 2 - 4
OOC: 4 - 4
Home: 1 - 0
Away: 1 - 1
Neutral: 2 - 3
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
03/31
N
3Purdue
66-72
11/21
N
3Purdue
67-71
02/28
H
5Auburn
92-84
11/29
A
8North Carolina
92-100
03/02
A
9Alabama
81-74
01/20
H
9Alabama
91-71
03/29
N
11Creighton
82-75
12/09
H
13Illinois
86-79
02/03
A
18Kentucky
103-92
11/22
N
19Kansas
60-69
11/10
A
21Wisconsin
80-70
01/10
A
31Mississippi St
72-77
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
03/09
H
18Kentucky
81-85
01/16
H
29Florida
85-66
03/23
N
30Texas
62-58
03/15
N
31Mississippi St
56-73
02/10
A
45Texas A&M
69-85
03/06
A
51South Carolina
66-59
Quadrant 2 5-1
Home: 1 - 1
Away: 2 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
OOC: 2 - 0
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
02/24
H
45Texas A&M
86-51
01/30
H
51South Carolina
59-63
12/16
N
63NC St
79-70
01/13
A
100Georgia
85-79
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
11/20
N
84Syracuse
73-56
02/14
A
115Arkansas
92-63
Quadrant 3 7-0
Home: 4 - 0
Away: 2 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
OOC: 3 - 0
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
01/06
H
90Ole Miss
90-64
12/05
H
93George Mason
87-66
02/07
H
94LSU
88-68
12/21
H
145Tarleton St
65-46
02/20
A
158Missouri
72-67
03/21
N
188St. Peter's
83-49
01/27
A
202Vanderbilt
75-62
Quadrant 4 5-0
Home: 5 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 4 - 0
Home: 4 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
11/14
H
185Wofford
82-61
02/17
H
202Vanderbilt
88-53
01/02
H
223Norfolk St
87-50
12/12
H
283Georgia Southern
74-56
11/06
H
336Tennessee Tech
80-42

Non-D1 0-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
No Games

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.