We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs
Location: Boiling Springs, NC Conference: Big South Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 361
High NET: 356 Dec 9
Low NET: 363 37 days
KenPom: 361
BPI: 363
Sagarin: 225
KPI: 355 T-Rank: 361
Opp Avg NET: 191
Avg NET Win: 303
Avg NET Loss: 183
NET SOS: 148
NET OOC SOS: 90
RPI SOS: 150
RPI OOC SOS: 68
Record: 2-28
Home: 1-9
Away: 0-16
Neutral: 1-3
SOR: 195
WAB: -22.57 (361)
OOC WAB: -8.61 (357)

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quad 1 0-3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
12/21
A
20Tennessee
52-94
11/07
A
34Clemson
59-97
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
01/07
A
75High Point
49-104
Quad 2 0-6
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 4
Neutral: 0 - 1
OOC: 0 - 3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
03/06
N
75High Point
59-81
11/03
A
81Minnesota
60-87
11/29
A
96UNC Wilmington
62-88
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
02/14
H
75High Point
87-112
11/18
A
102DePaul
62-93
01/03
A
131Winthrop
77-88
Quad 3 0-6
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 4
Neutral: 0 - 1
OOC: 0 - 4
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
02/12
H
131Winthrop
85-103
11/26
N
137Navy
51-84
11/22
A
165Richmond
67-102
12/03
A
189Queens
74-107
11/15
A
223Elon
84-95
01/29
A
239UNC Asheville
50-69
Quad 4 2-13
Home: 1 - 7
Away: 0 - 5
Neutral: 1 - 1
OOC: 0 - 3
Home: 0 - 2
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
12/06
H
220Georgia Southern
84-88
02/26
H
239UNC Asheville
71-77
02/17
A
242Charleston Southern
66-75
12/31
H
242Charleston Southern
79-89
12/15
H
246Wofford
57-83
02/19
A
252Radford
70-82
01/14
H
252Radford
80-89
02/07
A
260Presbyterian
62-68
01/17
H
260Presbyterian
55-92
02/04
H
266Longwood
66-86
01/21
A
266Longwood
56-91
11/28
N
295Southeastern Louisiana
68-76
03/04
N
303South Carolina Upstate
65-64
02/28
A
303South Carolina Upstate
61-71
01/23
H
303South Carolina Upstate
67-65

Non-D1 2-1 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
12/18
H
Toccoa Falls
105-65
12/12
H
Brevard
77-63
11/10
H
North Greenville
81-92

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.