We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Houston Cougars
Location: Houston, TX Conference: Big 12 Share: Show Links/Banners
Website: uhcougars.com Message Board: coogfans.com Shop: Buy Houston Cougars Gear

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team is projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 3
High NET: 2 5 days
Low NET: 21 Dec 3
KenPom: 2
BPI: 2
Sagarin: 4
KPI: 4 T-Rank: 1
Opp Avg NET: 72
Avg NET Win: 80
Avg NET Loss: 14
NET SOS: 25
NET OOC SOS: 74
RPI SOS: 18
RPI OOC SOS: 49
Record: 35-5
Home: 16-1
Away: 10-0
Neutral: 9-4
SOR: 2
WAB: 9.92 (3)
OOC WAB: -0.09 (49)

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quad 1 18-4
Home: 4 - 1
Away: 8 - 0
Neutral: 6 - 3
OOC: 4 - 3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 4 - 3
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
04/05
N
1Duke
70-67
11/09
N
2Auburn
69-74
04/07
N
4Florida
63-65
03/30
N
5Tennessee
69-50
11/26
N
6Alabama
80-85
02/24
A
7Texas Tech
69-61
02/01
H
7Texas Tech
81-82
03/22
N
8Gonzaga
81-76
02/22
H
9Iowa St
68-59
03/15
N
12Arizona
72-64
02/15
A
12Arizona
62-58
03/28
N
19Purdue
62-60
01/25
A
20Kansas
92-86
03/14
N
25BYU
74-54
03/08
A
30Baylor
65-61
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
03/03
H
20Kansas
65-59
01/04
H
25BYU
86-55
02/10
H
30Baylor
76-65
01/29
A
51West Virginia
63-49
01/18
A
71UCF
69-68
02/18
A
74Arizona St
80-65
01/11
A
75Kansas St
87-57
Quad 2 6-1
Home: 3 - 0
Away: 2 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 1
OOC: 0 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
03/01
H
50Cincinnati
73-64
01/15
H
51West Virginia
70-54
11/30
N
52San Diego St
70-73
02/08
A
86Colorado
69-59
12/30
A
95Oklahoma St
60-47
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
01/22
H
73Utah
70-36
03/13
N
86Colorado
77-68
Quad 3 5-0
Home: 4 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
OOC: 3 - 0
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
01/06
H
78TCU
65-46
12/07
H
83Butler
79-51
02/04
H
95Oklahoma St
72-63
12/10
H
99Troy
62-42
11/27
N
103Notre Dame
65-54
Quad 4 6-0
Home: 5 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
OOC: 6 - 0
Home: 5 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
12/21
H
165Texas A&M-CC
87-51
03/20
N
216SIU-Edwardsville
78-40
11/22
H
217Hofstra
80-44
12/18
H
238Toledo
78-49
11/04
H
264Jackson St
97-40
11/13
H
320Louisiana
91-45

Non-D1 0-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
No Games

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.