We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Houston Cougars
Location: Houston, TX Conference: Big 12 Share: Show Links/Banners
Website: uhcougars.com Message Board: coogfans.com Shop: Buy Houston Cougars Gear

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team is projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 1
High NET: 1 93 days
Low NET: 2 11 days
KenPom: 2
BPI: 1
Sagarin: 4
KPI: 2 T-Rank: 2
Opp Avg NET: 87
Avg NET Win: 98
Avg NET Loss: 17
NET SOS: 11
NET OOC SOS: 193
RPI SOS: 48
RPI OOC SOS: 24
Record: 32-5
Home: 17-0
Away: 7-3
Neutral: 8-2
SOR: 3

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 17-5
Home: 4 - 0
Away: 7 - 3
Neutral: 6 - 2
OOC: 5 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 1 - 0
Neutral: 4 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
03/16
N
6Iowa St
41-69
02/19
H
6Iowa St
73-65
01/09
A
6Iowa St
53-57
03/29
N
10Duke
51-54
01/23
A
12BYU
75-68
02/24
A
15Baylor
82-76
02/03
A
19Kansas
65-78
11/19
N
23Dayton
69-55
01/29
A
30Texas
76-72
02/10
A
37Cincinnati
67-62
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
03/09
H
19Kansas
76-46
03/15
N
27Texas Tech
82-59
01/17
H
27Texas Tech
77-54
02/17
H
30Texas
82-61
03/14
N
42TCU
60-45
01/13
A
42TCU
67-68
03/24
N
45Texas A&M
100-95
12/16
N
45Texas A&M
70-66
03/02
A
46Oklahoma
87-85
11/17
N
48Utah
76-66
03/06
A
61UCF
67-59
12/01
A
64Xavier
66-60
Quadrant 2 3-0
Home: 3 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 0
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
02/27
H
37Cincinnati
67-59
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
01/20
H
61UCF
57-42
01/27
H
70Kansas St
74-52
Quadrant 3 5-0
Home: 3 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
OOC: 3 - 0
Home: 1 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
02/06
H
123Oklahoma St
79-63
11/24
H
144Montana
79-44
11/16
N
149Towson
65-49
01/06
H
156West Virginia
89-55
03/22
N
162Longwood
86-46
Quadrant 4 7-0
Home: 7 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 7 - 0
Home: 7 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
11/11
H
179Texas A&M-CC
82-50
12/21
H
206Texas St
72-37
11/13
H
209Stetson
79-48
12/30
H
212Pennsylvania
81-42
12/06
H
241Rice
75-39
12/09
H
300Jackson St
89-55
11/06
H
309Louisiana-Monroe
84-31

Non-D1 0-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
No Games

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.