We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Utah Utes
Location: Salt Lake City, UT Conference: Pac-12 Share: Show Links/Banners
Website: utahutes.com Message Board: utehub.com Shop: Buy Utah Utes Gear

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 48
High NET: 14 Dec 30
Low NET: 54 Feb 25
KenPom: 48
BPI: 50
Sagarin: 81
KPI: 63 T-Rank: 40
Opp Avg NET: 94
Avg NET Win: 115
Avg NET Loss: 62
NET SOS: 44
NET OOC SOS: 28
RPI SOS: 264
RPI OOC SOS: 299
Record: 22-15
Home: 17-2
Away: 2-9
Neutral: 3-4
SOR: 64

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 4-10
Home: 2 - 1
Away: 1 - 5
Neutral: 1 - 4
OOC: 3 - 3
Home: 1 - 0
Away: 1 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 3
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
11/17
N
1Houston
66-76
02/08
H
4Arizona
99-105
01/06
A
4Arizona
73-92
12/09
H
12BYU
73-69
11/27
A
16St Mary's
78-71
03/14
N
25Colorado
58-72
02/24
A
25Colorado
65-89
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
02/03
H
25Colorado
73-68
04/02
N
28Indiana St
90-100
11/19
N
32St. John's
82-91
11/16
N
43Wake Forest
77-70
01/24
A
44Washington St
57-79
03/09
A
59Oregon
65-66
01/27
A
69Washington
73-98
Quadrant 2 6-3
Home: 5 - 0
Away: 1 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 2 - 0
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
12/29
H
44Washington St
80-58
02/15
A
88USC
64-68
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
01/21
H
59Oregon
80-77
03/24
H
62Iowa
91-82
12/31
H
69Washington
95-90
03/27
H
71VCU
74-54
02/18
A
107UCLA
70-69
01/14
A
113Stanford
73-79
01/04
A
134Arizona St
70-82
Quadrant 3 7-2
Home: 5 - 1
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 2 - 0
OOC: 3 - 0
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
03/19
H
77UC Irvine
84-75
01/11
H
107UCLA
90-44
02/29
H
113Stanford
90-68
03/02
H
128California
88-59
03/13
N
134Arizona St
90-57
02/10
H
134Arizona St
77-85
11/06
H
143Eastern Washington
101-66
03/07
A
165Oregon St
85-92
11/30
N
172Hawai'i
79-66
Quadrant 4 5-0
Home: 5 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 4 - 0
Home: 4 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
01/18
H
165Oregon St
74-47
12/16
H
173Utah Valley
76-62
11/10
H
231UC Riverside
82-53
12/05
H
271Southern Utah
88-86
12/20
H
318Bellarmine
85-43

Non-D1 0-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
No Games

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.