We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
Location: Cedar City, UT Conference: Western Athletic Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 272
High NET: 271 2 days
Low NET: 347 2 days
KenPom: 252
BPI: 292
Sagarin: 138
KPI: 255 T-Rank: 271
Opp Avg NET: 165
Avg NET Win: 209
Avg NET Loss: 151
NET SOS: 132
NET OOC SOS: 94
RPI SOS: 152
RPI OOC SOS: 233
Record: 7-22
Home: 4-6
Away: 2-15
Neutral: 1-1
SOR: 195
WAB: -16.34 (313)
OOC WAB: -6.20 (321)

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quad 1 0-3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
11/17
A
10Gonzaga
50-122
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
12/13
A
55Washington
69-105
11/04
A
73Arizona St
64-81
Quad 2 0-2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 0
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
01/08
A
86Utah Valley
72-89
01/10
A
98California Baptist
55-58
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
No Games
Quad 3 2-12
Home: 1 - 4
Away: 1 - 7
Neutral: 0 - 1
OOC: 0 - 4
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
03/05
H
86Utah Valley
88-92
01/21
H
86Utah Valley
84-70
03/07
H
98California Baptist
75-82
02/12
H
98California Baptist
66-83
11/08
H
126UT Rio Grande Valley
72-95
11/28
A
143Robert Morris
54-61
11/19
A
144Washington St
74-98
03/12
N
163UT Arlington
63-69
02/14
A
163UT Arlington
78-73
01/29
A
163UT Arlington
61-80
12/06
A
172Oregon St
70-81
01/24
A
177Utah Tech
91-102
12/29
A
177Utah Tech
66-80
02/19
A
230Tarleton St
74-78
Quad 4 5-5
Home: 3 - 2
Away: 1 - 3
Neutral: 1 - 0
OOC: 1 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
01/03
H
163UT Arlington
77-86
02/28
H
177Utah Tech
81-67
02/07
H
230Tarleton St
59-62
01/15
H
230Tarleton St
106-105
02/21
A
248Abilene Christian
83-87
01/31
A
248Abilene Christian
79-76
01/17
H
248Abilene Christian
74-52
11/15
A
261Omaha
85-90
11/29
N
312Stetson
70-68
12/18
A
315Northern Arizona
57-65

Non-D1 3-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
12/01
H
West Coast Baptist
124-59
11/22
H
Nobel
103-68
11/11
H
Bethesda University
118-60

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.