We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Southern Utah Thunderbirds
Location: Cedar City, UT Conference: Western Athletic Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 271
High NET: 207 Dec 5
Low NET: 276 Jan 17
KenPom: 242
BPI: 308
Sagarin: 138
KPI: 278 T-Rank: 252
Opp Avg NET: 186
Avg NET Win: 258
Avg NET Loss: 158
NET SOS: 173
NET OOC SOS: 135
RPI SOS: 137
RPI OOC SOS: 122
Record: 8-21
Home: 4-8
Away: 3-13
Neutral: 1-0
SOR: 309

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 0-3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
11/14
A
38Utah St
84-93
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
12/05
A
48Utah
86-88
02/10
A
50Grand Canyon
65-94
Quadrant 2 0-4
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
01/04
H
50Grand Canyon
75-96
11/21
A
99Louisiana Tech
53-67
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
12/02
A
119Seattle
63-73
02/22
A
129UT Arlington
85-90
Quadrant 3 2-7
Home: 0 - 3
Away: 2 - 4
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
02/15
H
119Seattle
68-78
02/01
H
129UT Arlington
68-76
03/02
H
145Tarleton St
83-88
01/25
A
145Tarleton St
73-70
01/06
A
173Utah Valley
62-80
03/07
A
175Stephen F. Austin
60-87
01/20
A
201California Baptist
76-83
12/19
A
208Montana St
88-89
01/27
A
229Abilene Christian
82-67
Quadrant 4 6-7
Home: 4 - 4
Away: 1 - 3
Neutral: 1 - 0
OOC: 3 - 2
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 1 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
02/17
H
173Utah Valley
75-78
01/13
H
175Stephen F. Austin
82-84
11/29
H
201California Baptist
66-91
11/22
N
206Texas St
74-67
02/29
H
229Abilene Christian
68-77
12/09
H
251Idaho St
82-74
11/06
A
259Cal St Bakersfield
72-73
02/08
A
285Utah Tech
68-70
01/18
H
285Utah Tech
75-65
12/22
H
288Middle Tennessee
69-63
12/16
A
312Northern Arizona
74-76
03/09
A
331UT Rio Grande Valley
68-59
02/03
H
331UT Rio Grande Valley
79-59

Non-D1 2-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
12/30
H
Antelope Valley
95-78
11/09
H
Life Pacific
108-73

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.