We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Austin Peay Governors
Location: Clarksville, TN Conference: ASun Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 282
High NET: 172 Dec 2
Low NET: 303 Jan 14
KenPom: 280
BPI: 290
Sagarin: 334
KPI: 267 T-Rank: 288
Opp Avg NET: 203
Avg NET Win: 245
Avg NET Loss: 177
NET SOS: 172
NET OOC SOS: 83
RPI SOS: 255
RPI OOC SOS: 121
Record: 12-19
Home: 6-5
Away: 4-13
Neutral: 2-1
SOR: 186
WAB: -14.39 (268)
OOC WAB: -5.21 (269)

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quad 1 0-2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
11/17
A
5Tennessee
68-103
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
12/21
A
48Vanderbilt
55-85
Quad 2 1-4
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 1 - 4
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 1 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 1 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
11/08
A
83Butler
68-66
01/18
A
84Lipscomb
60-88
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
03/03
A
113North Alabama
64-90
01/25
A
113North Alabama
84-88
12/08
A
116Samford
47-72
Quad 3 2-6
Home: 1 - 2
Away: 1 - 4
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 1 - 2
Home: 1 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
02/24
H
84Lipscomb
78-95
02/05
H
113North Alabama
64-74
11/11
H
115Chattanooga
67-61
11/30
A
148East Tennessee St
57-79
12/18
A
179Ohio
58-78
01/04
A
181Jacksonville
44-68
02/01
A
187Eastern Kentucky
82-88
02/20
A
199Queens
92-78
Quad 4 9-7
Home: 5 - 3
Away: 2 - 3
Neutral: 2 - 1
OOC: 1 - 3
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 1 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
02/13
H
173Florida Gulf Coast
73-60
01/16
H
187Eastern Kentucky
97-90
12/14
H
195Southern Illinois
60-65
01/11
H
199Queens
60-67
11/27
N
231UT Arlington
58-68
03/02
N
262North Florida
90-69
01/02
A
262North Florida
97-89
11/26
N
265Georgia St
62-50
11/20
A
317Morehead St
58-63
02/08
H
343Cent Arkansas
90-67
01/23
A
343Cent Arkansas
73-71
02/26
A
345West Georgia
70-73
01/09
H
345West Georgia
68-72
02/18
A
351Bellarmine
68-94
01/30
H
351Bellarmine
86-77
02/15
H
353Stetson
76-63

Non-D1 2-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
12/29
H
Brescia
93-46
11/04
H
Union (TN)
95-75

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.