We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Seattle Redhawks
Location: Seattle, WA Conference: Western Athletic Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 119
High NET: 106 3 days
Low NET: 147 Dec 4
KenPom: 107
BPI: 106
Sagarin: 165
KPI: 151 T-Rank: 115
Opp Avg NET: 188
Avg NET Win: 214
Avg NET Loss: 148
NET SOS: 210
NET OOC SOS: 235
RPI SOS: 217
RPI OOC SOS: 172
Record: 22-14
Home: 13-4
Away: 4-9
Neutral: 5-1
SOR: 144

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 0-4
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 1
OOC: 0 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
No Games
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
03/15
N
50Grand Canyon
72-80
02/01
A
50Grand Canyon
88-95
12/13
A
66San Francisco
59-62
11/18
A
71VCU
56-60
Quadrant 2 1-2
Home: 1 - 1
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 1
Home: 0 - 1
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
01/20
H
50Grand Canyon
86-79
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
12/17
H
69Washington
99-100
01/13
A
129UT Arlington
75-80
Quadrant 3 6-6
Home: 2 - 2
Away: 2 - 4
Neutral: 2 - 0
OOC: 5 - 0
Home: 2 - 0
Away: 1 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
12/20
H
99Louisiana Tech
79-73
03/27
N
110High Point
77-67
11/26
H
120UC San Diego
79-67
02/29
H
129UT Arlington
62-82
03/09
A
145Tarleton St
66-69
02/10
H
145Tarleton St
77-82
03/26
N
161Fairfield
75-58
11/29
A
173Utah Valley
72-78
01/18
A
175Stephen F. Austin
84-89
12/30
A
184UTEP
73-61
02/03
A
201California Baptist
61-60
03/07
A
229Abilene Christian
59-64
Quadrant 4 15-2
Home: 10 - 1
Away: 2 - 1
Neutral: 3 - 0
OOC: 5 - 1
Home: 3 - 1
Away: 0 - 0
Neutral: 2 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
01/26
H
173Utah Valley
62-61
02/22
H
175Stephen F. Austin
69-49
03/14
N
201California Baptist
81-57
01/06
H
201California Baptist
48-46
03/25
N
203Evansville
71-57
11/11
H
208Montana St
71-68
02/08
H
229Abilene Christian
75-52
02/15
A
271Southern Utah
78-68
12/02
H
271Southern Utah
73-63
02/17
A
285Utah Tech
66-65
01/04
H
285Utah Tech
70-53
03/23
N
305Delaware St
79-66
11/15
H
312Northern Arizona
60-62
11/22
H
321Idaho
92-55
11/08
H
327Prairie View A&M
71-60
02/24
H
331UT Rio Grande Valley
84-56
01/11
A
331UT Rio Grande Valley
80-81

Non-D1 1-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
12/09
H
Northwest University
101-46

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.