We noticed that you're using an Ad Blocker. We totally get it, nobody likes ads. The ads that we display are what allows us to continue offering this website for free to all users. If you enjoy our website please disable your ad blocker on this site, allowing us to pay the bills and keep the site alive. If you'd like to continue using an ad blocker, please consider a small donation through our Buy Me a Coffee page. Thank you for your consideration!
Central Connecticut State Blue Devils
Location: New Britain, CT Conference: Northeast Share: Show Links/Banners

Share - Use these links to share your team's banner on a website or message board. For Twitter simply link to this page.
HTML:
BBCode:
Link:

One of the tools that the NCAA Selection committee uses to evaluate teams is the Team Sheet.

The Team Sheets on Bracketologists include most of the same information presented in an easier to use format. Over time, the NCAA has also removed outside metrics from the Team Sheet's but we've continued presenting that data.

This team was eliminated from their conference tournament and is not projected to make the NCAA Tournament.
Schedule View Compare Team Sheet
NET: 341
High NET: 326 2 days
Low NET: 348 3 days
KenPom: 339
BPI: 330
Sagarin: 342
KPI: 352 T-Rank: 344
Opp Avg NET: 274
Avg NET Win: 323
Avg NET Loss: 251
NET SOS: 359
NET OOC SOS: 305
RPI SOS: 344
RPI OOC SOS: 292
Record: 10-22
Home: 6-7
Away: 4-14
Neutral: 0-1
SOR: 345

WINLOSSOOCHOMEAWAYNEUTRAL
Quadrant 1 0-1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 1
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home1-15 Neutral1-25 Away1-40
11/26
A
40Rutgers
49-83
Home16-30 Neutral26-50 Away41-75
No Games
Quadrant 2 0-2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 2
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 2
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home31-55 Neutral51-75 Away76-100
11/15
A
91St. John's
74-91
Home56-75 Neutral76-100 Away101-135
12/11
A
132Fordham
77-90
Quadrant 3 0-3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
OOC: 0 - 3
Home: 0 - 0
Away: 0 - 3
Neutral: 0 - 0
Games Remaining: 0
Home76-160 Neutral101-200 Away136-240
12/22
A
201St Joseph's
66-83
11/07
A
203Massachusetts
67-94
11/20
A
239UMBC
76-78
Quadrant 4 10-16
Home: 6 - 7
Away: 4 - 8
Neutral: 0 - 1
OOC: 3 - 6
Home: 1 - 4
Away: 2 - 1
Neutral: 0 - 1
Games Remaining: 0
Home161+ Neutral201+ Away241+
11/13
H
175Quinnipiac
70-72
11/29
H
176Brown
51-59
12/20
H
246Army
55-66
02/11
A
270Fairleigh Dickinson
77-73
01/14
H
270Fairleigh Dickinson
80-88
11/19
N
271Lafayette
50-55
11/23
H
273Maine
58-66
12/09
H
275Dartmouth
59-50
12/16
A
299Manhattan
78-67
11/11
A
299Manhattan
 
02/23
A
301Merrimack
54-70
01/26
H
301Merrimack
61-64
02/16
H
303Wagner
58-57
01/20
A
303Wagner
50-72
02/18
H
310Stonehill
94-90
01/07
A
310Stonehill
49-51
02/25
H
322Sacred Heart
67-69
02/04
A
322Sacred Heart
65-78
03/01
A
332St Francis (PA)
69-83
01/28
H
332St Francis (PA)
88-74
12/29
A
332St Francis (PA)
72-80
12/03
A
336Holy Cross
57-63
02/02
A
350St Francis (BKN)
48-53
12/31
H
350St Francis (BKN)
74-52
01/22
A
362LIU
58-42
01/05
H
362LIU
78-59
02/08
A
363Hartford
82-73

Non-D1 0-0 Games Remaining: 0
We know you like watching your team win by 50 points. It's fun but NET doesn't care about these games.
No Games

The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET), relies on game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses. The NET was built to create a ranking system that was as accurate as possible while also evaluating team performance fairly. To ensure fairness, certain types of data were omitted from the model. Of key importance, game date and order were omitted to give equal importance to both early and late-season games. In addition, a cap of 10 points was applied to the winning margin to prevent rankings from encouraging unsportsmanlike play, such as needlessly running up the score in a game where the outcome was certain.

The committee often refers to "team sheets" when comparing team performance. The team sheets contain in-depth team information about strength of schedule, performance against teams sorted by quadrants and results.

Starting with the 2017-18 season, the team sheets took on a new look. This change included each team's NET, but also include a team's ranking in five other metrics: the ESPN strength of record and BPI rankings, as well as the KPI, KenPom and Sagarin rankings. In addition, a team's schedule and results are now broken down in four quadrants that place greater emphasis on games played on neutral courts and in true road environments.

Starting with the 2020-21 season, the publicly available team sheets were simplified to no longer include the 5 other metrics added in 2017-18 putting a larger emphasis on NET rankings however the team sheets used by the committee still include them.

To learn more about NCAA NET Team Sheets, Click Here.